WOODCLIFF V WHITEHALL: THE CITY OF WHITEHALL’S EXTREMELY PREMATURE PLANS FOR LAND THEY DIDN’T OWN.

Here are some of the papers which show that Whitehall was considering ways to deal with Woodcliff for development a long time ago. They didn’t own the properties so why were they spending a bunch of money on firms to draw up plans and prospectuses for the area? Good question Jerry!

The city of Whitehall has had their fevered egos and grand schemes on these people’s properties now for nearly a decade. When a push is made to say they’re a nuisance and the processes available to our government through our laws, which they abuse, are then used to realize this ultimate dream for city hall, which includes misuse of eminent domain, Whitehall are not innocents, they are avaricious and scheming and designing and corrupt. 

The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the law of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.“-  John Adams

This information was originally in the blog post:

https://whitehallwatchblog.com/2015/10/30/woodcliff-v-whitehall-part-two-the-pirates-of-whitehall/

 

woodcliff plan

Note the date in the bottom left corner

 

woodcliff plan

5/2009

woodcliff plan 2

woodcliff plan 3

woodcliff plan 4

 

woodcliff plan 5

This is a screenshot of this document from my blog along with my caption. Everyone wondering where the community pool is might find my point both telling and meritorious.

 

woodcliffe, Mr. Knoblauch

3rd paragraph, 1st and 2nd sentences

 

 

 

 

Unknown's avatar

About Gerald Dixon

Born and raised in Whitehall Ohio. Graduated WYHS class of 1980. Pursued acting career, NYC '88 to '95 and '03 to '08, Los Angeles '97 to '03. Purchased family home on Doney St. in '07 where I currently live.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to WOODCLIFF V WHITEHALL: THE CITY OF WHITEHALL’S EXTREMELY PREMATURE PLANS FOR LAND THEY DIDN’T OWN.

  1. Pingback: WOODCLIFF v WHITEHALL: THE CITY HALL SELL JOB EDITION (WITH COUNTER-ARGUMENTS!) | Whitehall Watchblog

Comments are closed.